Someone smack him, I think he's starting to skip. That or his vocabulary only consists of "flip-flop" and "liberal".

He should just fucking die already.

You never know, maybe he's scratched.

From now on, every time you say that, I'm going to post a picture of a flip flop.

http://www.edirectory.co.uk/pf/image...ages/dedo2.jpg

OMFG!!!!

GG

NO RE (seriously)

What if he says flop-flip. Can you get a backwards flip-flop? I still think he's scratched. I think we need to trade him at the store for a new one.

Shh. Don't give him ideas.

Sorry. What if I, or someone else says flip-flop?

What about liberal? You must have a pic. of a liberal. He might go crazy and say liberal!

THE HORROR!!!!!

If he says liberal, I'll reply with bigot, and:

heh, shit, this forum has more democrats than i thought.

i love how left wing democratic kerry supporters tell me to think rationally when they try to conujure up some scenario to compare china invading the us to the us taking out terrorist leaders in the middle east. you make me fucking sick, volls.

WRONG. Maybe YOU would vote for someone simply because of party affiliation, but most people here wouldn't. In case you haven't noticed, none of us are gung-ho about Kerry, but we're PRETTY damn sure he's better than Bush.

because he isn't bush? way to be hypocritical you fucking piece of shit. voting for someone because of their political denomination is no different than voting for someone because they just plain aren't someone else.

besides, where are you pulling that fucking assumption that i would vote (if i could) for someone because of them being a democrat/republican? out of your ass? that's what i thought.

state reasons or facts for why bush is so goddamn bad or why kerry actually even deserves to be president of this country and maybe you won't look like such a fucking fool. case closed.

Let's be kind now. :D

for all i care, slim can be as ignorant as he wants. no matter what, he still eats shit. (refer to pic below)

Have you missed all the posts about this same fucking topic? Why repeat what 5 other people have said 3 times already, it's redundant.

.. what the fuck are you talking about? i was talking to you, numbnuts.

What the =FUCK= is that picture? Oh god.

Other people have already expressed why Kerry is their choice over Bush, and honestly I agree with most of them. Get it now, or should I slow it down a little more?

Last I heard, Saddam had NO link to Al Qaeda other than some members were in his country. Show me some official news otherwise, and I will look at it.

As far as the China scenario, that was in SPECIFIC response to the idea of us going over and "liberating" them. What we consider "liberated" and what they consider "liberated" may be different, fuckwad. Forcing our system and beliefs on them is akin to slavery, and I don't agree with forcing people to do ANYTHING.


lib·er·ate ( P )
tr.v. lib·er·at·ed, lib·er·at·ing, lib·er·ates
To set free, as from oppression, confinement, or foreign control.
Chemistry. To release (a gas, for example) from combination.
Slang. To obtain by illegal or stealthy action: tried to sell appliances that were liberated during the riot.



Freedom is what I stand for, not freedom for Iraqis at gunpoint, dipshit. We're not liberating them if we're forcing our system of doing things down their throats. All we've done for them is give them an opportunity to change the face that appears on their Dollar bills.

What the hell are you talking about? Before the US went into Iraq and liberated the people they had nothing. They could be put into prision for no reason, it was horrible over there. Now they can atleast have a chance at making their country great. Before if you weren't in the hierarchy of Sadam you were basically screwed, and if you were a Kurd then you screwed unbelievably. I mean the Kurds had to deal with no voice in how the country was run, like most of the other iraqies. They also got chemical and biogliogical weapons shot at them.