Zelaron Gaming Forum

Zelaron Gaming Forum (http://zelaron.com/forum/index.php)
-   Forum News, Suggestions and Discussion (http://zelaron.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Tired of waiting? (http://zelaron.com/forum/showthread.php?t=42211)

Titusfied 2007-04-24 10:13 AM

How far away am I WW? 25 days?

!King_Amazon! 2007-04-24 11:30 AM

11 Titusfied (13 days to 100%) 79.5%


You can just look on the "stats" page to see how far away you and everyone else is.

Titusfied 2007-04-24 11:31 AM

Oh, I never knew that.

Willkillforfood 2007-04-24 12:48 PM

Titus, you will never make it.

Titusfied 2007-04-24 04:43 PM

I lost already.. :cry:

Vollstrecker 2007-04-24 08:53 PM

On the stats page, I'm a bit confused. There are people with significantly higher activity than I (Thanatos) who have the same amount of 'days to 100%' as I do, which is 13 days.

Is this to lock it in, or is it time until we get to 100%? Looking at that page, it's hard to find any trend.

!King_Amazon! 2007-04-24 08:57 PM

I explained this in a recent thread.

Example:

John Doe has 99% activity, but he misses a post. He then has to wait for the whole period to cycle before he can get 100%.

Thus, "time until 100%" is not relative to activity, really.

Vollstrecker 2007-04-24 09:00 PM

So, miss a single post in a day and you have to start the whole process over?

!King_Amazon! 2007-04-24 09:26 PM

Yes, because missing a single post means you don't have 100% activity.

Vollstrecker 2007-04-24 09:37 PM

I see. Explains that, then.

Thanatos 2007-04-25 09:23 AM

MUAHAHAHA. I will never get to 100%, though.

klo 2007-04-25 09:30 AM

Yea it should be done on weekly posts, because I won't connect internet at home right now...so no posts on weekend....

!King_Amazon! 2007-04-25 10:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thanatos
MUAHAHAHA. I will never get to 100%, though.

You're at 95% right now.

Lenny 2007-04-25 11:03 AM

I still say that when there is more than one person at, say, #1, the list should be ordered alphabetically, or in the order that the people reached 100%.

!King_Amazon! 2007-04-25 11:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lenny
I still say that when there is more than one person at, say, #1, the list should be ordered alphabetically, or in the order that the people reached 100%.

It's ordered by join date, so screw you Lenny.

Lenny 2007-04-25 11:11 AM

This saddens me. :( I'm going to be about 9th before the members who joined after me hit 100%.

!King_Amazon! 2007-04-25 11:15 AM

It's not because of your join date, it's because you're english.

WetWired 2007-04-25 01:04 PM

Actually, if you pay attention, everyone at 100% is #1.

Lenny 2007-04-25 01:56 PM

I know. When I said "I'm going to be 9th", I didn't mean 9th on the Stats list, but rather the 9th person who is at #1, because all the members who joined before me will push me down the list of those at #1.

Sovereign 2007-04-25 02:01 PM

Haha. It's ok. I'm sure if we went by time spent at 100 I'd still beat you :p


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:48 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
This site is best seen with your eyes open.