Zelaron Gaming Forum

Zelaron Gaming Forum (http://zelaron.com/forum/index.php)
-   Test Forum (http://zelaron.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=37)
-   -   Shrink this for me? (http://zelaron.com/forum/showthread.php?t=45225)

D3V 2008-03-31 08:48 PM

Shrink this for me?
 
1 Attachment(s)
I need this to fit filewise as my avatar and am too lazy/unknowing of how to shrink the file size (compress)

HandOfHeaven 2008-03-31 08:49 PM

Sweeeeet!

talentedhamster 2008-03-31 08:52 PM

*sigh of dissapointment*

WetWired 2008-03-31 09:02 PM

Trying for another ban, huh?

Xenn 2008-03-31 09:04 PM

There's nothing wrong with that...

HandOfHeaven 2008-03-31 09:05 PM

:D I need to go to the washroom now... :(

D3V 2008-03-31 09:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WetWired
Trying for another ban, huh?

Doesn't violate any rules.

WetWired 2008-03-31 09:25 PM

Quote:

Avoid indecent/sexually suggestive content in signature and avatar especially, since users do not have the option to block only your signature/avatar.
As I've already explained, pictures featuring pretty much just breasts fall into the catagory "sexually suggestive", never mind what the animation is. For like the tenth time: allowed in posts, not allowed in sig or avy.

!King_Amazon! 2008-03-31 10:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WetWired
As I've already explained, pictures featuring pretty much just breasts fall into the catagory "sexually suggestive", never mind what the animation is. For like the tenth time: allowed in posts, not allowed in sig or avy.

Hope you don't mind explaining it again in a week when he tries again. If you haven't noticed yet, he's pretty dense.

D3V 2008-04-01 06:59 AM

Goddamnit, these rules need to change, seriously. First you say no nudity, then you say no partial nudity, then you say no nudity if they are technically nude (hand bra), then no partial nudity or partly nude etc. Meh. I just want a new avatar.

!King_Amazon! 2008-04-01 07:14 AM

No, the rule is not NO NUDITY for sigs/avatars, it's no indecency. You can post indecency(borderline nudity) in posts, as long as it isn't nudity, but you can't put it in a sig or avatar, because people cannot turn that off, and they cannot avoid it.

This is how it always has been and always will be.

D3V 2008-04-01 07:16 AM

I'm not blocked and I still post borderline shit in my posts, so basically that's a rule that doesn't hold true to anything.

!King_Amazon! 2008-04-01 07:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by D3V
I'm not blocked and I still post borderline shit in my posts, so basically that's a rule that doesn't hold true to anything.

What the hell are you talking about?

Thanatos 2008-04-01 07:21 AM

el gay

i miss the avatar i had for like a week...

D3V 2008-04-01 07:22 AM

Cleveage isn't indecent, matter of fact I love it.

WetWired 2008-04-01 07:22 AM

This isn't about what's in posts. Obviously, this is fine as a post, because you're not banned. The rules for avatars and sigs are different from the rules for posts.

D3V 2008-04-01 07:23 AM

I know, WW.

Thanatos 2008-04-01 07:24 AM

god DAMN THOSE ARE SOME MONSTER TITTIES

D3V 2008-04-01 07:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by !King_Amazon!
What the hell are you talking about?

Quote:

Originally Posted by KA
No, the rule is not NO NUDITY for sigs/avatars, it's no indecency. You can post indecency(borderline nudity) in posts, as long as it isn't nudity, but you can't put it in a sig or avatar, because people cannot turn that off, and they cannot avoid it.

Avoid, block same thing. :weird: What i'm saying is the people that do get PMS about it don't have me blocked anyways, so wouldn't it essentially be ineffective as rule/feature?

!King_Amazon! 2008-04-01 07:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by D3V
Cleveage isn't indecent, matter of fact I love it.

Rule for posts:

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Rules
All humanoids in posted or linked to pictures or sites must be clothed.

Rule for Sigs/Avatars:

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Rules
Avoid indecent/sexually suggestive content in signature and avatar especially, since users do not have the option to block only your signature/avatar.

If you post that image in a thread, I can avoid it to prevent from getting in trouble at work or wherever. If you put it in a signature or avatar, I cannot avoid it, because any thread you've posted in will have it. This is why the rule is more strict for signatures and avatars.

D3V 2008-04-01 08:11 AM

Dude I know the fucking difference you don't have to keep explaining it to me i'm seriously not that dull, what i'm saying is the reasoning behind the difference in avatars and post content saying that you can block out one and not the other is illadvised because blocking out posts never happens.

!King_Amazon! 2008-04-01 05:41 PM

Clearly you're not understanding me. What I'm saying is that it's alright because if you put it in a post you're only putting it in ONE POST. If you manually put it in every single post you posted on the forums, it would no longer be alright.

The rule makes perfect sense, you're just too fucking dense to realize it.

Asamin 2008-04-01 06:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WetWired
As I've already explained, pictures featuring pretty much just breasts fall into the catagory "sexually suggestive", never mind what the animation is. For like the tenth time: allowed in posts, not allowed in sig or avy.

Awwww come on. Let him do it. You know all the guys here would love it!

!King_Amazon! 2008-04-01 06:18 PM

Except for the ones who have jobs and visit from work and could potentially get fired for it.

Atnas 2008-04-01 10:16 PM

Those boobs are too big.

talentedhamster 2008-04-02 03:05 AM

yeaaaaa. i dont wanna see that

D3V 2008-04-02 07:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by !King_Amazon!
Clearly you're not understanding me. What I'm saying is that it's alright because if you put it in a post you're only putting it in ONE POST. If you manually put it in every single post you posted on the forums, it would no longer be alright.

The rule makes perfect sense, you're just too fucking dense to realize it.

Christ K_A, you honestly think that I don't know the difference between the fucking avatar and one single post with boobs in it? You are just trying to be a jackass now and disagree. You are too dense to even comprehend what I've been saying to you, therefourth you fail, again.

WetWired 2008-04-02 09:23 AM

Or maybe you're spewing gibberish and only you understand what you're saying.

Asamin 2008-04-02 05:31 PM

Then make a thing that allows you to block someone's avatar and/or sig. But ya. Those are some friken big boobs!

!King_Amazon! 2008-04-02 06:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WetWired
Or maybe you're spewing gibberish and only you understand what you're saying.

This. I'm done.

Asamin 2008-04-03 03:21 PM

Nice. Got him owned there. Poor guy.

-Spector- 2008-04-09 07:58 AM

bt mon eh?

Wed-G 2008-04-09 09:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Asamin
Then make a thing that allows you to block someone's avatar and/or sig. But ya. Those are some friken big boobs!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Asamin
Nice. Got him owned there. Poor guy.

I haven't posted in this thread until now just because getting in the middle would be unwise, but posting stuff like this is just unnecessary.

First, it's not that easy to just, "Hmm, I guess I could make a avatar filter." WW has too little time as it is to implement such a feature if possible.

And two, I honestly don't feel that anyone got "owned" here. It's a legitimate discussion and the goal shouldn't/isn't to humiliate the other to prove your own dominance.

Thanatos 2008-04-09 10:24 AM

Epic boobs.

talentedhamster 2008-04-09 04:27 PM

aren't they your sisters?


hahaha i win!!

Atnas 2008-04-09 04:29 PM

Delicious incest. : D

Asamin 2008-04-09 06:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by talentedhamster
aren't they your sisters?

Damn right they are! He is one desperate SOB.

Wed-G 2008-04-09 09:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Asamin
Damn right they are! He is one desperate SOB.

Anyone feel this thread has gone to spam? Not trying to feign authority here but I think it's bled dry.

Back to the topic, shrinking the image to fit within the guidelines would be impractical if not impossible. It's nearly half a megabye and contains 117 images so getting it smaller would involve taking out images.

HandOfHeaven 2008-04-10 12:28 AM

Test.

Kaneda 2008-04-10 12:52 AM

1.You guys are stulid for not allowing that.

2.OOOOOOOLD Dev old


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:21 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
This site is best seen with your eyes open.