The future of GBA
 

There may be no future for the GBA. Sony's biggest shock at E3 was the PSP. A handheld game. Wel all knew it was going to happen at sometime. Anyway I want to know if you think that Nintendo should be worried. They say they're not but they're bluffing. We all know about GBA so here's a site for info on the psp. www.gamespy.com/articles/june03/sony

When it comes out, it will kick so much ass. The only problem that i can think of is anti-skip protection.

agreed

Another very possible problem is that Sony makes VERY cheap hardware.

Explain!

I don't think Nintendo has to worry about a thing.

Why the fuck would Nintendo be in trouble? GBA has the best RPGs in my opinion currently. Also, they have a lot of games out so far. It should be similar to the situation when X-box and the Cube came out. PS2 had lots of games, so there was more excitement over the PS2. I don't think Nintendo has anything to worry about.

Yes they do. The PSP will probably remake all the PSX and PS2's best games. GBA=HISTORY

Is all this just leading to cheap pc's for all? I think so.

There Kuja its back.

You're dreaming. Anyway, if there's going to be a remake battle, I'm sure Nintendo could ask for remakes of its SNES games on the GBA. They could all be redone with better graphics as well, though I'd like them the way they are. The SNES has the best games ever made, so I wouldn't think remakes of PSX games would hurt Nintendo one bit.

I don't know Bob. Sure, SNES has some of the best RPG's ever invented, but PS1 has good ones too. I'd rather be playing Final Fantasy VII during a car-ride than any other game I can think of. Hell, I'd buy PSP for that sole reason if they were to port FFVII to it.

agreed.

Please don't do that, that counts as spam!

Somebody needs to explain to me what spam is... Just because a post is short, it does not make it spam.. does it? He expressed his thoughts, just as uncapped did. He just did it in fewer words. Anybody have a definition of spam?

Well, we used to have a list somewhere, but basicly to simply say agreed is spam, but to say why you agree or in what way you agree is not...

I though spam was when you either post useless info or you post info on something that doesn't go along wit the thread's purpose.

To simply say that you agree is useless info unless you were asked.

Edit:

You have to understand that most of the non-standard spam clasifications are for behavior typical of post rushers--people that will post anything for any reason to quickly raise their post count so that they feel important.

I used to be like that. But a feformed man has been born. I shall not spam (unless others are) I shall post some dumb threads but in the chat forum. I will make usefull threads and post interesting stuff.

Yes I have been reformed