why evolution is wrong
 

its wrong because lets saywe fill a norewritable cd half full we can only take info out but not put info into it that the same with everything through the process of natural selection:grin: :grin: :grin:

*sigh*

Natural selection is not the sole factor in evolution. What about gene flow? What about genetic drift? What about point mutations? Transitions? Transversions? Insertions? Deletions? Gene duplications? Translocations? Inversions? Aneuploidy? Polyploidy? Go to the pubmed database, and type in any of those, and find hundreds, if not thousands of examples, and those are just the ones I remember off the top of my head.

The CD analogy is not even faulty, it's completely nonsensical.

emolution is wrong coz emolution is the process of becoming emo

I seriously lol'd IRL.

That isn't a very good argument..All your arguments are Two sentences long.. Evolutions is wrong? Well, Then your Religion is wrong. I find it hard to believe that a so called "Entity" made this world. Simply because, Nothing can come from Nothing, Correct? Thus everything must be created. So the creator of this planet, would have had to of been created by another entity. So your worshipping the wrong creator..

I wonder if this guy is Draco? He has similar grammar and similar puerile arguments.

Haven't a clue. Possibly.

I was so ready to move this to the Opinion and Debate forum, you know. Hell, I'd even selected Mantra and !K_A!'s posts and was about to click the magical button that would allow me to split them into a new thread in the Chat Forum - I was going to call it "Professor Mantra's Theory of Emolution"... yeah, not very original, but I've just woken up.

So yes, I was going to, then I read the argument, and all joy left me. :( Unless it gets a lot better, it's staying here. Which makes me a saaaad panda.

I checked almost immediately. It's not. Draco was a bit more intelligent, anyway.

i do think like draco alot so ha

Do you even know who Draco is?

I know. I read the thread title and got excited, only to see what argument he'd given me.

/signed
To have something you must have energy. Energy can not be created or destroyed, it must be changed. therefore, we must have come from something. The most sensical thing I can think of that supports religion is that "God is all around us, He is even in you!"

Where did the first molecule come from that the universe was created from?

In a thread about evolution, that's not really relevant.

And if that's supposed to be an argument for God, it's pathetic. It says nothing about any evidence indicating a God, it merely states that we have a question left to answer. It's an argument from ignorance.

No-one will know if there is truly a God until they die.

So in the wrong place and MJ will rip you a new one :D

Just curious. What makes you think, even if there is a God, that you will find out when you die? There very well could be a God but we still just die and nothing happens after that.

But if that is a case, I thought it was destined that, if you believe in god and followed the right path, You would go to heaven. And if believed in god, and lived a life of sin, or didn't believe in god, you were going to hell. So if there is a god then you would wind up in Heaven or Hell. But if there isn't then you rot in the ground..IMO.

According to Christian beliefs, yes. However, I'm talking about God in general, not necessarily the "Christian" God. The existance of a God and the existance of an afterlife are not necessarily related. There could be a God but no afterlife.