As I said, I am not going to give the people here the full rundown on a character. That completely defeats the purpose of these battles. If I give the members all the information I have, then all someone has to do is quote my description and use it as their argument. The point here is to be inventive and original with one's arguments, not have the whole match handed to them on a platter. I'll try to make my descriptions of the entrants more detailed, but I'm not gonna list everything they are capable of.

One of the reasons I go about it like this, is because I can see a number of ways that almost all of the matches could have gone differently. I can think of strategies for every one of the battles that could have given Mario, Link and Jinx the victory, and could have made it absolutely impossible for Mog to win. If I start giving ultra-specific descriptions of what each combatant is capable of, then it doesn't require people to think creatively. I'm just handing people the arguments that I would have used if I was participating. Do you understand what I'm saying? I want people to start thinking "outside the box" in terms of these battles. If I give super-detailed descriptions, people will just regurgitate what I've posted. I don't want that.