And that is why if a council is used. the members must be level headed and not easly ticked off.
to vote on a member it would be wise for each of the council to look thought the last 50 or so.?. post of the member and give a rateing and then the adverage of the rates can be the final judeing the gramar, spelling , and interlectional input of the member each of which is graded and adveradged. I would rate my current post 5 on gramar 4 on spelling and 9 on input = 6 on this post, but of course this would be hard to do for 50 post so it would be an adverage of all the post that figure in the grade.

a way around the problem of bias is to ( when its obvious that a council member dislikes a reg member, to have another un-bias reg member take the spot of the bias council member in that particular vote.

ie x hates y but a b c d dont so the score is 0 7 6 8 6 = 5.4
in which the other coucil members would know that x has a grude on y and would call in an extra member to be the feith vote. which may come out as 7 7 6 8 6 = 6.8

post in the wrt and chat forum should be ignored durring judgeing beacuse members rarely post anything worth while in those areas of zelaron.

does anyone follow me or iam i just thinking it out to much?