| |
|
|
|
 |
Posted 2007-11-27, 09:55 AM
in reply to D3V's post starting "MJ did the exact same thing
..."
|
|
|
|
D3V said:
|
It's not worth the time or effort to even try sifting through MJ's replies searching for an actual response behind all of the backward-ass logistically placed comments that aren't even relevant to the argument itself.
|
Yea. Two lines. Heaven forbid!!! You're going to get eaten by the long-winded-post monster D3V! Grow up.
Quote:
|
You did basically the same thing, scroll up a few lines, calling the professor an idiot is the same presumption giving you have heard his side, and we've all heard your opinion on things on numerous occasions.
|
Incorrect. The professor is an idiot because he was not able to promulgate simple syllogisms to his students that would have entirely trashed a lot of what the second student was rambling on about. You, on the other hand, have a problem with the idea that I'm trying to convey. You've basically already made your mind up. That much is obvious when you're calling me ignorant based on something I haven't said. I can pinpoint exactly why the professor is an idiot. What he should have done that would have stripped him from his current title of idiot. And I wholeheartedly intend to friday or saturday. You, on the other hand, just have a problem with my ideology. You won't say why. You'll just say I'm ignorant, and decree by fiat that I'm wrong. Open your mind. Grow up.
Quote:
|
I don't think you're getting my point, you are breaking this down too much, the simple fact that you are trying to turn this into an argument about an argument is idiocracy.
|
I'm simply pointing out the incessant hypocrisy in your statements.
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|