Aside from some details, I agree with most of what Dar_win said. What I don't understand is why people (in general) are so quick to dismiss Clinton (or any other candidates)? From the elections I can remember, people quickly dismiss all or many of the candidates available as being somehow inadequate for presidency. I fail to see how we can judge that based solely on the issues. Now, bringing up her term in senate may be a different story. She may have been an inept senator, but from what I've read she really wasn't. If you disagree with presidential candidates on the issues, I understand if you dismiss them. My question is, how can you claim that they are unfit for the job based solely on that?