Wit is Educated Insolence

Very heated debate about this a year of two back. What do YOU think?

I voted yes. Wit is nothing more, what I think, than innuendoes linked to something you don't need to know about.

I blame Senesia for this.

You fag, James.

Since i have no idea what we are talking about ill just assume that james is a communist, so i shall vote that.

Insolence is negative, wit is negative somtimes but it can be positive as well, so I had to vote no.

I put a definition of Insolence below, just to keep things straight.

Insolence

n 1: the trait of being rude and impertinent; inclined to take liberties [syn: crust, gall, impertinence, impudence, cheekiness, freshness] 2: an offensive disrespectful impudent act

I blame Senesia for this. You fag, James.

I thought you would get a hearty chuckle from this.

Flashback from two(?) days ago:

Senesiata: Wit Is Educated Insolence
GravitonSurge: FUCK YOU

Where is this thread? I think I missed it.

I voted that you are a communist and now it is tied at 4 with yes.

I vote that the Canadian has to put it back in his sig.

Insolence is uneducated wit f00.

wit is a different form of sarcasm.... and i think i heard that sarcasm is a sign of a weak mind from Home Alone, or some other movie / show

I vote that the Canadian has to put it back in his sig.

Deal. .

See, it's true.