Draco2003 said:
And yes, there obviously is another side of this world, because where would ghosts go?
|
You're basing this on the existence of ghosts . . .
If ghosts exist, why do you think that they would need to live "on the other side?"
Quote:
As for evidence, no one has any evidence to fully support their claim at the time it is proposed. And if you wanna talk about evidence, then where is your evidence that there is no such thing as ESP?
|
Okay, here's the deal with that statement. When you make such a preposterous, controversial, outrageous statement, it is
your job to prove it to me, not my job to disprove it. However, I have provided enough evidence to why ESP can not exist in the form you are talking about in my previous posts. Which part do you not understand?
Quote:
Even if I did have evidence, would you look at it seriously, or go, "That's impossible." and never think about it again. Even if I had all the evidence in the world, people would still disagree. Just like there is no evidence to support Jesus, God, or the fact that 2 people created the whole world, yet they had 2 sons....
|
If you had evidence, I would certainly consider it. However, it would need to be credible evidence, not "Because I've done it." If that's your reason then it is
far more likely that you are schizophrenic than you possessing superhuman telepathic abilities.
Quote:
I guess what I am trying to say is that theories don't need evidence to be true, just a belief that it is possible.
|
A belief alone does
not make a theory true in any way, sense, or fashion.
Quote:
Until it is absolutely positivly proven that telepathy and other psychic abilitys are a figment of the imagination, then people, as well as I, will continue to believe that it does exist.
|
You can go ahead and believe it, that doesn't mean it's not absurd. Anyway, you were claiming that it
does exist, not that you
believe it exists.
Quote:
As for research to discover psychic abilitys, people are going about it all wrong.
|
And you would be an expert in this field? Do you know
how researchers are going about to finding it? Can you better their methods? If not, then I don't think it's your place to claim whether a method that a researcher uses is good or bad. What makes you such an expert on this topic?
Quote:
In this day and age, technology is all mighty and if technology can explain it, then it must be true, and if not, then it is false.
|
I don't think AI is quite sophisticated enough to start explaining things to humans quite
yet. Technology hasn't explained a damn thing to me.
Quote:
People are trying to analyze it through a scientific nature, but it is either not gonna happen or take an extremely long time.
|
Why?
Quote:
Oh yeah, I almost forgot. The person dying part, I said they see the person. And if you have seen anyone on thier deathbed, you would know that even if they WANTED to call someone to say goodbye, they wouldn't be able to.
|
What? I didn't fully understand your above paragraph, can you rephrease please.
Quote:
you know, i just remembered something. i have a friend who sometimes has dreams of a certain person dying, and a short time later, the person she sees dies in the same way that she saw at the same time(provided the time is mentioned somewhere in that dream. if there is no time mentioned then it just happens and she doesn't know when) also, when she tries to change the outcome something worse happens instead.
|
OOH, OOH, I
know this movie.