Moderated Visitor Comments

Would boost activity hundredfold in my opinion.

Don't understand what you mean.

New members have to have their posts approved before they are viewed. I don't see what else you could mean, and I don't see how it relates to activity.

Please clarify.

I mean allow guests to post.

It was brought up but never implemented, I believe for security reasons. I can't remember. Hang on, I'll check the staff forum.

Couldn't find much on it. If I remember right, it was stated by WW that doing so would flood the forum with random posts, so Lenny suggested a 5 post limit for guests based on IP. After that, I think the idea just died.

It was brought up but never implemented, I believe for security reasons. I can't remember. Hang on, I'll check the staff forum. Couldn't find much on it. If I remember right, it was stated by WW that doing so would flood the forum with random posts, so Lenny suggested a 5 post limit for guests based on IP. After that, I think the idea just died.

Flooding the forum with random posts, as long as they are moderated, does not seem bad. I mean, after all, what we want is more posts.

I thought that what we want is more posting members? The problem with the 5 guest post thing is that it's just not easy to do. Hell, there's been times when keeping someone banned who actually registers has been a real challenge...