|
|
|
 |
Posted 2004-06-12, 10:57 AM
in reply to Slim's post starting "You said better terms, not blatant lies."
|
 |
 |
 |
By the way, here's the current state of the draft legislation. Its fairly side-tracked for the time being. Not dead, but not doing much either.
-frick
S 89 Status
S.89
Title: A bill to provide for the common defense by requiring that all young persons in the United States, including women, perform a period of military service or a period of civilian service in furtherance of the national defense and homeland security, and for other purposes.
Sponsor: Sen Hollings, Ernest F. [SC] (introduced 1/7/2003) Cosponsors (None)
Related Bills: H.R.163
Latest Major Action: 1/7/2003 Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
STATUS: (color indicates Senate actions)
1/7/2003:
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
HR 163 Status
H.R.163
Title: To provide for the common defense by requiring that all young persons in the United States, including women, perform a period of military service or a period of civilian service in furtherance of the national defense and homeland security, and for other purposes.
Sponsor: Rep Rangel, Charles B. [NY-15] (introduced 1/7/2003) Cosponsors (14)
Related Bills: S.89
Latest Major Action: 2/3/2003 House committee/subcommittee actions. Status: Executive Comment Requested from DOD.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
STATUS: (color indicates Senate actions)
1/7/2003:
Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
2/3/2003:
Executive Comment Requested from DOD.
2/3/2003:
Referred to the Subcommittee on Total Force.


A friendly community and exciting role playing
experience awaits you at Quest Of Ages!
Click my sig to enter...
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|