Concept: The GravitonSurge system of approval!

Yeah, it could be amusing at the least. So...why not, I say?

because Chruser said no.

You know what, this sounds like a damn good idea to me.

And you know, I have been here for quite a while, rarely spam (and I mean RARELY spam), and unless I am joking, I rarely say anything stupid (and I mean RARELY say anything stupid). My judgement is usually pretty damn good, and what do I have to show for it? Nothing. I have never been a staff member, and I am rarely said to be one of those people who is "one of the smarter members" or "one of the better (blanks)"............................... if you know what I am getting at. But the Nazi's of uber cookie cutting popularity are quite obviously the better choice for a position like the council.

Anyways, I am for the idea, no matter how judgement systems pan out, however I reccomend as man categories with catchy names as possible. I also suggest that these categories aren't just on a ladder. They could vary to different personalities, such as a comedy stamp of approval, a flaming stamp of approval, a grammar stamp of approval; these would be quite similar to badges or medals in the military, except that we would have uber 1337 h4xor names for them.

GG folks.

For as much as I dis-like Grav at times, I still repect him enough to say this is a damn good idea.
Well theres my two cents.
Poll as of now is

• 21 - yes
• 5 - no

And you know, I have been here for quite a while, rarely spam (and I mean RARELY spam), and unless I am joking, I rarely say anything stupid (and I mean RARELY say anything stupid). My judgement is usually pretty damn good, and what do I have to show for it? Nothing. I have never been a staff member, and I am rarely said to be one of those people who is "one of the smarter members" or "one of the better (blanks)"............................... if you know what I am getting at. But the Nazi's of uber cookie cutting popularity are quite obviously the better choice for a position like the council.

Hmm.. for some reason, I don't have any opinion of you, good or bad. Kind of like I didn't even know you're here. I usually associate people to their avatars; get one.

Swish! I'm Al Bundy!

So, any word on if we could actually MAKE a system like this work, or if it has officially been vetoed by Chruser?

Avatar... gwah...

Even if Chruser "officially vetoes it", he can't stop 5 People from making a council, making special sigs or avatars or something. After that, those 5 or so people could all have listed in their signatures who they have put into what groups... however quite obviously, the only way that we could make this truly official, is with the Swede's approval.

He is against good ideas. Just look at how fucking long it has taken them to get donuts out for the old members. By the time we get them, they'll be the last donuts in our post apocalyptic world.

I'm not against the idea, I just see a certain bias factor popping up. The alternative is obviously to let ALL members vote. The1 and such "disliked members" would be dissed by both the jury AND the general board population, so the question is whether or not it really makes much of a difference.