Do you realise that deadly strike fucks up barbs? if you wear gores, thats 15% ds, and deadlystrike makes the barbs mastery critical strike % NULLIFY and become useless; why the hell would u use draculs? open wounds isnt a huge object, and the lifetap doesnt work with ww, u cant cast spells on hit with ww~ steels and travs i remain standing
learn the facts Zub, i bet u dont even kno the chance to do critical strike forumla, this is a conceptual problem, not to your lame linear approach. If you were good enuff to know that CS + DS results in a diminshed return to DS. The point of wearing draculs and gores in BvB is to gain OW, you are now corrected for your stupidity.
learn the facts Zub, i bet u dont even kno the chance to do critical strike forumla, this is a conceptual problem, not to your lame linear approach. If you were good enuff to know that CS + DS results in a diminshed return to DS. The point of wearing draculs and gores in BvB is to gain OW, you are now corrected for your stupidity.
gah, ive never really liked ow or psn.... ow i can moderately live with because if someone fuckin hits u with a sword? UR GONNA BLEED but ehh... i still rather duels of pure damage/life and defence =)
gah, ive never really liked ow or psn.... ow i can moderately live with because if someone fuckin hits u with a sword? UR GONNA BLEED but ehh... i still rather duels of pure damage/life and defence =)
tell that to the rest of bnet, its the survival of the fittest
Fireclaws usually doesnt have a chance against ww because bears have horrible fhr; and fireclaws doesnt exactly get extremely godly attack rating(i dont remember if fireclaws is an autohit like rabies and charged strike)
Yeah... survival of the fittist it is i guess but if ur gonna be that mean just use a fucking stacking bone necro ~_~ i have yet to see one of those be killed by a single person in a real duel of just 1 on 1. Yes its the mosty gay ass cheap fighting style of d2 but it works and if ur gonna be talking about survival of the fittist then you just gotta use what works right? I dont really go for all out pvp chars, i say a good char is a char that can both own pvp and pvm; thats why i stick to ww barbs, slow but steady in pvm; only challange is iron maiden and then u stick to zerk.
Fireclaws usually doesnt have a chance against ww because bears have horrible fhr; and fireclaws doesnt exactly get extremely godly attack rating(i dont remember if fireclaws is an autohit like rabies and charged strike)
Yeah... survival of the fittist it is i guess but if ur gonna be that mean just use a fucking stacking bone necro ~_~ i have yet to see one of those be killed by a single person in a real duel of just 1 on 1. Yes its the mosty gay ass cheap fighting style of d2 but it works and if ur gonna be talking about survival of the fittist then you just gotta use what works right? I dont really go for all out pvp chars, i say a good char is a char that can both own pvp and pvm; thats why i stick to ww barbs, slow but steady in pvm; only challange is iron maiden and then u stick to zerk.
.......FC gets GODLY amounts of AR i dunno what ur smoking, also bears can still have good FHR with 4 frame FC. Necros arent gods, only the person using them makes them godly, you my friend have a strange philisophy to dueling.
.......FC gets GODLY amounts of AR i dunno what ur smoking, also bears can still have good FHR with 4 frame FC. Necros arent gods, only the person using them makes them godly, you my friend have a strange philisophy to dueling.
It's True that it's the person that uses the necs that makes them godly, but you can't deny the fact that necros have a slight adventage over some other classes.