Would we be better off, if...?

Of course we'd be better off. I was a Bush supporter and I can see that.

I was talking to a guy at work yesterday and politics got into play and he tried to say that we'd be 100x better off with Bush being in office still over Kerry (he's one of the 32% that still support bush). Pretty horrible.

I can't see how someone could think that even if they used to support bush. I kept supporting him even after all of his screw ups, but it gets to the point that you have to re-evaluate.

The worst thing about Kerry was he was a flip-flopper and a liar. Big whoop. So was Clinton, he was decent enough.

Hell, most politicians are flip-floppers and liars.

Yea, I think we'd be better off with Kerry/Edwards.

I don't see what's so bad about flip-flopping in light of new evidence anyway.

Yea, I think we'd be better off with Kerry/Edwards. I don't see what's so bad about flip-flopping in light of new evidence anyway.

I would be considered a flip-flopper by those standards too. I don't see what is wrong about reversing a decison in light of new evidence, I suppose it might be bad for a politician since most people (morons) think that anyone qualified to run the country should be above making mistakes...

Yea, I think we'd be better off with Kerry/Edwards. I don't see what's so bad about flip-flopping in light of new evidence anyway.

Preach it, brother. I was one of the few people who spoke out in favor of them at my highschool. Geez, I hate living in a conservative bible touting state. Dear God, say "I think abortion should be the choice of the mother ...I don't feel right telling a woman what she can or can't do with her body" and you're automatically the anti-christ.

If there were no abortions there would be 40 MILLION more people in the U.S.

There are already too many people in the country as it is so I'm definitely for abortion.

If there were no abortions there would be 40 MILLION more people in the U.S. There are already too many people in the country as it is so I'm definitely for abortion.

Liewise.


I was the biggest supporter of Bush, eventhough he had massive scewups. I still think he would have done better then Kerry, but thats based more on a personal opinion and not fact. I still think that going to war was a bad idea, but now that we did, i say let him finish what he started. You cant just go into another country, bascially destroy it, start to rebuild and then say fuck it were out. I dont like the idea of our boys being hurt over there, but what else should we do, pull out and let Iraq turn into shit. Plus, we need the oil haha.

I can't see how someone could think that even if they used to support bush. I kept supporting him even after all of his screw ups, but it gets to the point that you have to re-evaluate. The worst thing about Kerry was he was a flip-flopper and a liar. Big whoop. So was Clinton, he was decent enough. Hell, most politicians are flip-floppers and liars.

Well MJ is right reguarding the Flip-flopping. When Kerry found out about new information reguarding the WMDs, i'm sure of him changing his views, I mean making the best decision on the information that is presented to you is all that you can do, Bush had lied about the WMD documents etc etc and got the whole country to follow.

Even Cheney flip-flopped for the worst, ..http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/nation..._cheney29.html

He said back in '92 that invading Iraq would be quagmire etc, and he had no problem pushing for it right after 9/11.

I think the phrase 'having a good president' is completely contradictory these days.

Well Bill Clinton was a pretty good president, even doing so fixing the problems that George Sr left behind.