test

Haha, I can understand his point. I always am under the understanding that if somebody wanted to manipulate the website in anyway bad enough, they would find a way to do it. Hindering of posting anything with HTML tags or even some Flash/BB code stuff obviously makes the site slightly safer, but honestly...

Haha, I can understand his point. I always am under the understanding that if somebody wanted to manipulate the website in anyway bad enough, they would find a way to do it. Hindering of posting anything with HTML tags or even some Flash/BB code stuff obviously makes the site slightly safer, but honestly...

KA's PM pretty much crashed my computer. I'd rather not people be able to do that.

LOL, I mean they are funny in a sense. How's about if somebody pulls a stunt after they are enabled ban for ... 3-6 months first offense?

Haha, I can understand his point. I always am under the understanding that if somebody wanted to manipulate the website in anyway bad enough, they would find a way to do it.

Yeah, it's called an XSS Attack or Cross-site Scripting Attack. Gotta be careful! HTML is dangerous if left on and not protected against in any manor. Also, allowing HTML would also allow CSS in which I could write a style sheet in this area I'm writing that could cut a margin off the top of the page if your using FireFox. Or I could potentially do other malicious things, specifically javascript, not that I'd do it. However, that group that attacked before might. If you even recall that day.

That's my two cents, I'm out.