2004 Election

So your fine with letting Kim have his way and the North Koreans starving eh?

And you're fine with endangering the lives of 280+ million US citizens, and for that matter 6 billion people in the world? You're an ignorant sheep following the sheepherder (Bush) on whatever he decides to do. Think about it for five minutes and you'll realize just how stupid your stance on this is.

You're saying that we should directly endanger the WHOLE WORLD with mutually-assured destruction that WOULD happen if we were to try and invade North Korea since they do have nuclear weapons. You're saying that a few million "starving people" is worth putting the rest of the world on the line?

This and WWII are two completely different scenarios. If you want to try and use the reasoning that people who hold my opinion are the reason Hitler and Stalin did all their shit, think about what the circumstances were then. Hitler didn't have nukes. Russia fucking knew that if they were going to use their nuclear arsenal that the world would end, so they didn't do anything on that scale. But North Korea and its leader probably aren't going to think as rationally as Stalin did, because they don't really have much of a reason for being around anyway. You're basically saying that pissing off a guy with no nukes or a guy with nukes who knows what will happen if he uses them is the same as pissing off a guy with nukes who couldn't give a shit if his country was around after a war, so long as he gets to use his weapons to destroy capitalistic populations first.